I guess a real late bloomer would be Stephen Smale who I think likes the term applied to him. Witten and Grothendieck may actually be considered somewhat late bloomers, Witten because he decided to go into math/physics much later than practically anybody with his level of success and Grothendieck largely because of fleeing the holocaust(!) and not getting the pre college education typically given to advanced students entering ecole normale superieure. He got "discovered" in math 55, did great research as an undergrad, went to Princeton and impressed everybody etc. I was saying the opposite.I don't think Manjul was a late bloomer at all. His creative talent was obvious and he was no more a late-bloomer than were Witten or Grothendieck. Maybe he wasn't quite as ridiculously advanced as classmates like Kedlaya and Vadhan, but as an undergrad he knew a hell of a lot more than the typical undergrad who later becomes a math professor. ) while being a course assistant for mid-level undergrad math classes. That said, few people have the ability to truly understand and judge the real world output of people like this.īhargava was taking the graduate algebra class at Harvard as a sophomore (maybe he was a junior. His publications include An Introduction to Measure Theory (2011) and Solving Mathematical Problems: A Personal Perspective (2006). Speculation about some score on some theoretical abilities test is pretty pointless. Terence Tao, a Fellow of the American Academy since 2009, is Professor of Mathematics at the University of California, Los Angeles. The ultimate measure of intelligence should real world results, not some score on an abilities test. I don't see much value in the question in the OP. Also, I think you over emphasize pre reqs when it comes to grad school. He is a professor of mathematics at the University of California, Los Angeles, where he holds the James and Carol Collins chair. I mean, given his father, he would have some idea of his immense talent in physics far before undergrad. Terence Chi-Shen Tao FAA FRS is an Australian mathematician. Perhaps he wanted to try something else at first, his other studies and career track some form of rebellion or respite from the path he knew he would be bound to follow. Witten was probably a precocious, highly intelligent kid who learned math and physics from his father. I looked up Witten after hearing about him on PBS. obviously they made the right choice but he must have done something incredible to impress someone so much to ignore the fact that he had no formal background in the sciences I know max raker said he didn't know, but does anyone know how the hell he got into the grad program in applied math at princeton? did he teach himself all the prerequisite math? did he just blow away the interviewers to the point where they figured he'd teach himself? i just cannot imagine what had to occur for the admissions staff to let in a guy with a BA in history.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |